Pardon
A government decision relieving legal consequences of a criminal conviction.
A pardon is a government decision to allow a person to be relieved of some or all of the legal consequences resulting from a criminal conviction. It may be granted before or after conviction, depending on the laws of the jurisdiction. Pardons can serve as a tool to overcome miscarriages of justice, offering freedom to those wrongly convicted or subjected to excessive penalties, and are sometimes granted when individuals are deemed to have paid their debt to society.
- Definition
- Government decision relieving legal consequences of a criminal conviction
- Granting authority
- Varies by jurisdiction (e.g., governor-general, president, parole board)
- Purpose
- Overcome miscarriage of justice, grant freedom, or recognize rehabilitation
- Controversy
- May be seen as political favor or arbitrary
- Related concept
- Clemency, record suspension, royal prerogative of mercy
Lore & Background
Pardons can be granted before or after conviction, depending on jurisdiction. They are viewed as a tool to correct miscarriages of justice, allowing freedom for those wrongly convicted or given excessive penalties. The second-best theory of pardons sees them as second-best to fair justice. In some jurisdictions, accepting a pardon may implicitly constitute an admission of guilt, leading some to refuse it. Cases of wrongful conviction are increasingly handled by appeal, but pardons are sometimes offered when innocence is undisputed to avoid retrial costs. Clemency plays a critical role where capital punishment exists.
Reader's Guide
Pardons are significant as a mechanism for mercy and correction of judicial errors, but they also generate controversy when perceived as political favors. Their arbitrariness and limited political accountability have been criticized. In Australia, the pardon power is the royal prerogative of mercy, exercised by the governor-general or state governors. Chile's president can grant particular pardons by decree, though terrorism convictions are excluded. The varying rules across countries highlight the tension between mercy, justice, and accountability.
Did You Know?
- A pardon may be granted before or after conviction for the crime, depending on the laws of the jurisdiction.
- Accepting a pardon may implicitly constitute an admission of guilt in some jurisdictions.
- In Canada, a pardon does not erase the fact of conviction but keeps the record separate and apart from other criminal records.
- Chilean law forbids particular pardons for those convicted of a crime of terrorism.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Pardon in constitutional law?
Pardon refers to a formal government act that removes some or all of the legal penalties attached to a criminal conviction. It effectively frees the recipient from the remaining consequences of that conviction, whether those consequences involve incarceration, fines, or civil disabilities.
Who holds the authority to grant a Pardon?
The power to issue pardons is distributed differently across jurisdictions; in some systems it rests with a president or governor-general, while in others a parole board or similar body may act. The specific office or institution named as the granting authority is typically set out in the constitution or enabling statute of that jurisdiction.
What is the primary purpose of the Pardon power?
At its core, the pardon exists to correct wrongful convictions or excessively harsh sentences and to recognize that a person has genuinely rehabilitated. It also functions as a safety valve in the justice system, allowing the executive to step in when the ordinary legal process has produced an unjust outcome.
Can a Pardon be issued before a person is even convicted?
Yes—depending on the rules of a given jurisdiction, a pardon may be extended either before trial concludes or after a final verdict. This flexibility means the power can serve both as a pre-emptive shield against prosecution and as post-conviction relief.
Why do critics call the Pardon power controversial?
Because the decision to pardon is often made on a single executive's discretion, opponents argue it can be wielded as a reward for political allies or applied inconsistently across similar cases. Critics therefore view it as a potential channel for favoritism rather than a neutral correction of judicial error.
More in Constitutional Law 1-24
Elsewhere in the Constitutional Law universe
Spotted an error? Know more?
This is a living reference — every entry is fact-audited, and reader corrections feed straight into our audit queue. Suggest an edit · See this site's audit record